Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 house of lords mrs donoghue went to a cafe with a friend. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 extract from the judgment of lord atkin in this way it can be ascertained at any time whether the law recognizes a duty, but only where the case can be referred to some particular species which has been examined and classified. Mrs donoghue poured half the contents of the bottle over her ice cream and also drank some from the bottle. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 case summary webstroke law. Skivington is the one nearest to the present and without that case and the statement of baron cleasby in francis v. Lords buckmaster and tomlin dismissed the appeal, which means they decided in favour of the defendant mr stevenson that there was no legal duty of care owed to mrs donoghue. Lord aitken stated that a neighbour was anyone who is so closely and directly affected by my act, or failure to act, that i ought reasonably to. It is known worldwide and has had a significant impact on the law of delict in scotland and the law of negligence in england, wales and other jurisdictions. Donoghue filled her glass and drank some of the contents. With all that has been written about donoghue v stevenson, could. Lord buckmaster, lord atkin, lord tomlin, lord thankerton, and lord macmillan. And cordozo was certainly not the first person to advocate a generalised formula for the existence of a duty of care the credit for this must surely go to brettescher, as seen in heaven. In the united states the law is laid down in the same way.
She had some ginger beer, which was in an opaque bottle, with her ice cream, and later she emptied the rest into a glass. She drank some of it, and found out that there are remains of a decomposed snail in it. Jun 18, 20 a fun shortfilm recreating the events of the famous case of donoghue v stevenson 1932. It created the modern concept of negligence, by setting out general principles whereby one person would owe a duty of care to another person. The case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 is very important, as it set a major precedent the legal concept of duty of care in the 1932 case, the judge, lord aitken, defined the neighbour principle. Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any. The drink, ginger beer was supplied in a dark opaque bottle. A young lady was bought a bottle of ginger beer by a friend. Instead of donoghue v stevenson, there would have been donoghue v minchella, an unremarkable breach of contract case, distinguished only by its picturesque facts, in which a cafe owner was sued for selling a tainted product to a customer. The dispute was ruled in favour of the plaintiff donoghue, which consequently established the modern concept of negligence. It is requested that an image or photograph of the new memorial to donoghue v stevenson, located in paisley, be included in this article to improve its quality. Pdf when i first saw the snail and the ginger beer, i was attracted. Mr justice mh mchugh, neighbourhood, proximity and reliance in. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562, 580 per lord atkin.
To take a real case, and one which will be familiar to any students of english law, in donoghue v stevenson 1932, the facts of the case were these. Case analysis donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 written by. May donoghue, a shop assistant, met a friend at the wellmeadow cafe in paisley, near glasgow. Her story without doubt is one of the most famous in legal history. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ukhl 100 was a foundational decision in scots delict law and english tort law by the house of lords. Needless to say, i was in, even before gaining a full appreciation of martins mastery of the subject of donoghue v. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 this piece will move towards english tort law and scots delict law by taking a view at the famous donoghue v stevenson case. Three found in favour of mrs donoghues appeal, including lord atkin. Donoghue s journey fired my imagination and the concepts of duty of care, foreseeability, and proximity seemed no less magical than the transmutation of base metals into noble ones. It made legal history in the 1932 case of donoghue v stevenson. The principle established in donoghue v stevenson was seen as an important milestone in the history of tort law as it was the first successful attempt to set out a general principle with respect to the concept of the duty of care. Bbc news the legal case of the snail found in ginger beer.
The ratio decidendi in the case was that the liability of negligence did not depend on the contractual relationship and that stevenson owed the duty of care to donohue as a manufacturer, not to cause foreseeable injuries to the users of the products. She consequently suffered shock and gastric illness and sued the manufacturer. This paper represents a deep analysis of one of the most famous cases of western law. Stevenson according to donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562. Stevenson 1932 mrs donoghue was in a cafe with her friend. Dickson introduction the purpose of this assignment is to discuss the creation and application the case law resulting from the decision in donoghue v stevenson. Sir harry gibbs legal heritage centre supreme court library. The case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 introduction.
Stevenson has not only influenced the english product liability law. The case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 is very important, as it set a major precedent the legal concept of duty of care. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 this is the neighbour principle, a way of describing at a general level which relationships give rise to a duty in law to take care. Donoghue or mcalister v stevenson, 1932 all er rep 1.
May donoghue has had a huge impact on millions of peoples lives around the world. For further background, see a rodger lord rodger of earlsferry, mrs donoghue and alfenus varus 1988 41 current legal problems 1, and lord macmillans speech in donoghue v stevenson 1992 108 lqr 236. If you where to ask a lawyer today what case they think is the most famous case in legal history most would say without hesitation the case of donoghue v. The case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 ukhl 100 is one of the celebrated cases that must be mentioned when determining when a duty of care exist in negligence. An independent tort which consists of a breach of legal duty to take care which results in damage undesired by the defendant. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
It created the modern concept of negligence, by setting out general principles whereby one person would owe a duty of care to another person also known as the paisley snail 5 6 or snail in the bottle case, the facts involved mrs donoghue drinking a bottle of. However, later the courts started to acknowledge that the neighbour principle was too simplistic and limited in scope. Had mrs donoghue herself been the purchaser the course of the law would have run quite differently. Negligence as a mode of committing certain torts trespass, nuisance or defamation. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 was a foundational decision in scots delict law and english tort law by the house of lords.
Stevenson was gradually used to cover more and more situations where liability did not lie at common law. Pdf donoghue v stevenson and neighbour principle saken. The case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 is a famous scottish case. Nov 20, 2009 the mollusc in question was a common snail that ended its days in a bottle of ginger beer. On the evening in question, may donoghue, at that time a 30yearold shop assistant, boarded a tram in glasgow for the thirtyminute journey to. Ratio decidendi of donoghue v stevenson free essays. In 1932 lord atkin handed down a judgment that would become one of the most significant cases of the common law world, donoghue v stevenson. The friend ordered and paid for a bottle of ginger of beer for donoghue. The drink was manufactured by the defendant stevenson. It laid the foundation of the modern law of negligence, establishing general principles of the duty of care. Steverison to reality as well as chattels in overruling a series of cases that, in the absence of a contract, exempted builders a and landlords from liability for the dangerous conditions of premies. The modern law of negligence really begins in 1932 when the famous decision in donoghue v.
The ginger beer came in an opaque bottle so that the contents could not be seen. When the bottle arrived, the waiter poured a portion into a glass tumbler. Duty of care means a proposition of law which defines. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 chapter 4 page 165 relevant facts on 26 august 1928, may donoghue met a friend at a cafe in paisley. The modern concept of duty of care was first defined by lord atkin in the famous landmark case of donoghue v. Secondly, there has been some dispute about the facts. Lord aitken stated that a neighbour was anyone who is so closely and directly affected by my act, or failure to act, that i ought reasonably to have them in my. The doctrine of negligence introduction donoghue, a scottish dispute, is a famous case in english law which was instrumental in shaping the law of tort and the doctrine of negligence in particular. The origins of the principle of duty of care the concept of duty of care is a proposition of law which defines the standard of care owed by one person to another or to a group of others.
Donoghue attempted to claim against the manufacturer of the ginger beer stevenson claimed that he owed her a duty. Donoghue v stevenson is an incredibly significant case in the development of the law. If there were indeed a duty not to cause damage to another carelessly, there would be no need to establish the existence of a duty in each case, since this would be implied in all situations. The mollusc in question was a common snail that ended its days in a bottle of ginger beer. Stevenson case produced lord atkins controversial neighbour principle, which extended the tort of negligence beyond the tortfeasor and the immediate party. As a result of the remain, donoghue suffered from nervous shock and gastroenteritis.
Sir harry gibbs legal heritage centre supreme court. The friend brought her a bottle of ginger beer and an ice cream. The plaintiff donoghue received a ginger beer bottle bought for her by a friend from a cafe. She is the pursuer in a case in which the defender,3 david stevenson, allegedly failed to take due care in bottling some ginger beer that donoghue drank as part of an ice cream. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible wikipedians in scotland may be able to help the free image search tool may be able to locate suitable images on flickr and other web sites. Home databases world law multidatabase search help. A fun shortfilm recreating the events of the famous case of donoghue v stevenson 1932. It created the modern concept of negligence, by setting out general. Now the issue before all the courts was a purely legal one. Donoghue, a scottish dispute, is a famous case in english law which was instrumental in shaping the law of tort and the doctrine of negligence in particular. The case of donoghue v stevenson is widely known in legal circles, not just in scotland and the uk but throughout the world, as the source of the modern law of negligence. Stevensons argument the manufacturer, page 565 in cases like this, the manufacturer owes no duty to the consumer apart from the contract. The singular case of donoghue v stevenson, by matthew chapman, isbn 9780854900497, published by wildy.
Whilst donoghue v stevenson was not the first case to create a general duty of care extending to both purchasers and downstream buyers, neither was buick. Many legal principles arose from the ruling of the house of lords. Stevenson, the courts judged the manufacturer of the ginger beer, david stevenson of paisley owned a duty of care to mrs donoghue even though there was no contract between them. It laid the foundation of the modern law of negligence, establishing general principles of the duty of care outline. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 the snail in the bottle duty of care created donoghue and her friend stopped for a drink at a cafe. She had drunk some of the ginger beer, which was in an opaque bottle, before she discovered that there was a decomposing snail in the bottle.
It raised the question of exactly which people might be affected by negligent actions. In lord aitkins neighbour principle, liability should be found as long as someone failed to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions. In donoghues case she had not purchased the ginger beer but had received it as a gift. She suffered great mental shock and severe gastroenteritis. Donoghues journey fired my imagination and the concepts of duty of care, foreseeability, and proximity seemed no less magical than the transmutation of base metals into noble ones. Mr justice mh mchugh, neighbourhood, proximity and reliance in pd finn ed, essays on. The bottle contained the decomposing remains of a snail though this was not visible. Discuss the significance of donoghue v stevenson to the. Legal issues involved the principal legal issues analysed by the house of lords in this case were. Donoghue v stevenson neighbour principle neighbour principle lord atkins neighbour principle, that people must take reasonable care not to injure others who could foreseeably be affected by their action or inaction, was a response to a question a lawyer posed to jesus. Admittedly, the case does not come within either of the recognized exceptions to the general rule.
Oct 25, 2015 donoghue v stevenson 1932 ukhl 100 was a foundational decision in scots delict law and english tort law by the house of lords. For example, tlbe house of lords applied donoghue v. It laid the foundational principle for the modern law of negligence. It begins on an unremarkable sunday evening on 26th august 1928. Neighbour principle thirdly the donoghue v stevenson case. Donoghues friend purchased her a bottle of ginger beer. It is known worldwide and has had a significant impact on the law of delict in scotland and the law of negligence in england, wales and. Donoghue v stevenson project gutenberg selfpublishing. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ukhl 100 was a landmark court decision in scots delict law and english tort law by the house of lords. In introducing negligence as a tort in its own right, it has not only increased available remedies but also taken over other fields where it would not have applied before. In the 1932 case, the judge, lord aitken, defined the neighbour principle. Business law donoghue v stevenson case study essay bartleby.
80 514 402 101 1493 1329 64 758 1410 813 159 1599 367 786 615 114 135 1358 915 1612 1276 1198 1247 283 1581 406 389 107 850 102 945 421 1433 1119 558 1364 773 971 467 1342 133 1436 1317 1488 478 551 916 1096 103